This is how social conservatives interpret an article which outlines the economic impact of the gay marriage ruling in Iowa. An economic impact which is positive, by the way.
In fact, the Iowa Supreme Court did not, nor did they need to, rely on the economic impact of same-sex marriage. For someone to say that same-sex decisions were based solely on the economic impact is not only wrong, but ignorant.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: culture war, economics, Frank Rich, Prop. 8
Frank Rich gives an economic perspective on the retreat of the culture war:
Once again, both the president and the country are following New Deal-era precedent. In the 1920s boom, the reigning moral crusade was Prohibition, and it packed so much political muscle that F.D.R. didn’t oppose it. The Anti-Saloon League was the Moral Majority of its day, the vanguard of a powerful fundamentalist movement that pushed anti-evolution legislation as vehemently as it did its war on booze. (The Scopes “monkey trial” was in 1925.) But the political standing of this crowd crashed along with the stock market. Roosevelt shrewdly came down on the side of “the wets” in his presidential campaign, leaving Hoover to drown with “the dries.”
Much as Obama repealed the Bush restrictions on abortion and stem-cell research shortly after pushing through his stimulus package, so F.D.R. jump-started the repeal of Prohibition by asking Congress to legalize beer and wine just days after his March 1933 inauguration and declaration of a bank holiday. As Michael A. Lerner writes in his fascinating 2007 book “Dry Manhattan,” Roosevelt’s stance reassured many Americans that they would have a president “who not only cared about their economic well-being” but who also understood their desire to be liberated from “the intrusion of the state into their private lives.” Having lost plenty in the Depression, the public did not want to surrender any more freedoms to the noisy minority that had shut down the nation’s saloons.
In our own hard times, the former moral “majority” has been downsized to more of a minority than ever. Polling shows that nearly 60 percent of Americans agree with ending Bush restrictions on stem-cell research (a Washington Post/ABC News survey in January); that 55 percent endorse either gay civil unions or same-sex marriage (Newsweek, December 2008); and that 75 percent believe openly gay Americans should serve in the military (Post/ABC, July 2008). Even the old indecency wars have subsided. When a federal court last year struck down the F.C.C. fine against CBS for Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction” at the 2004 Super Bowl, few Americans either noticed or cared about the latest twist in what had once been a national cause célèbre.
I found this opinion piece compelling. Rich convincingly articulates the argument that the culture war is ending, in large part because of the economy. However, how do we reconcile that view with a high profile, insanely expensive, and divisive campaign against gay marriage in CA that resorted to the same lies and smear tactics that the religious right has successfully used over the last forty years? Frankly (pun intended), I’m not sure you can.
